Publishing in academia can be a scramble. If you’re working on a “hot” topic, then there’s a demand to get your results out before someone else does it first. That’s not a good reason to rush a manuscript, or to submit an article to a publication just because it has a faster turnaround time, but it does add a sense of urgency (and sometimes that’s a good thing). This is publish or perish in action.
A Publishing Conundrum
This sense of urgency is amplified when you are just starting in your field. If you’re a new graduate student, or just changing topics, then there’s a lag time before people in your area know (or care) who you are. Academia isn’t a popularity contest, but it’s much easier to find people to work with if you’ve established yourself. Plus, if you’re trying to lay a foundation for future publications, then you don’t want the publication turnaround of the first paper to be a bottleneck on the followup results.
I found myself in this situation early in my PhD. I was over a year and a half into my program and I had two publications on my work. There was a conference paper that I presented in December 2012 but which wouldn’t be published until July 2014. Then, I had the journal paper extension that I submitted in January 2013. The first round of reviews for that paper appeared 8 months later, and it was almost one year before the paper was accepted (without any major changes being made). In the meantime, I had more results to share. These results relied on my earlier work. What was I to do? I posted my work on arXiv.
Reasons to Post to arXiv
Here is my list of reasons to publish to arXiv:
- Gives you a way to cite otherwise unpublished work. I was able to cite my unpublished journal paper in my followup manuscripts by posting to arXiv, which gives you a persistent link. This method was preferable to what I had previously done (hosting on my personal website).
- Announces what you have done as soon as possible. Of course, posting on arXiv does not compare with a formal peer review process and having the paper accepted by a reputable journal. But it does establish what you have done much earlier, puts your name “out there”, and gives other researchers a way to cite your work.
- Shows that you are confident in your work. Posting unpublished work to arXiv can be exposing (a bit more on that below). You need to be confident in the quality of your work if you’re willing to make it available for all time, especially before it has been peer reviewed.
Considerations when Posting
There are consequences to posting on arXiv. Here are some that you should consider:
- Submissions are permanent. Even though articles can be withdrawn, they cannot be completed removed once they are made public (more on that here). Fortunately, you can update your manuscript as you make revisions, but all versions remain accessible.
- Submissions take LaTeX source code. The preferred format is LaTeX, and you cannot submit a PDF file that was compiled from LaTeX. So, anyone can see all the comments in your source files. You might want to “clean” them up before submission.
- Be careful with licensing. You need to assign a license when you submit your paper. You don’t want to choose a license that will conflict with publishing your paper elsewhere, which brings me to my next point:
- Be careful to follow rules of other publishers. Fortunately, many publishers allow their authors to also post their work on arXiv. For example, the IEEE allows it, with the condition that “Upon publication, the author must replace the preprint with either 1) the full citation to the IEEE work with Digital Object Identifiers (DOI) or a link to the paper’s abstract in IEEE Xplore, or 2) the accepted version only (not the IEEE-published version), including the IEEE copyright notice and full citation, with a link to the final, published paper in IEEE Xplore.” A searchable database that lists copyright policies for different publishers and journals can be found here (thanks for Birkan for the link!).
- Watch out for delays in getting posted. Your paper could get flagged and then you need to wait for your paper to be manually approved. I describe an extreme case in this post, which was most likely because of how I classified the paper.